Beta Launch March 2026 • 40% lifetime discount

Ruthlessly evaluate any startup idea against two critical criteria: Can you monetize it fast (easy audience reach, day-1 revenue potential)? Can you build it fast (plan in 2h, build in 2h, deploy in 2h)? Get a GO/NO-GO verdict with specific action steps.
Free to use • No credit card required
Inspired by Josh Pigford's 7-day journey: saw opportunity → built → got paying customers → sold for $15,000.
This skill evaluates any startup idea against two brutal criteria:
Tell me your startup idea. Be specific about:
Example: "A tool that checks domain name availability across multiple TLDs and suggests alternatives when your preferred name is taken. Target: indie hackers and startup founders. Pricing: $5/month or $29 lifetime."
---
Instructions: First, I'll make sure I understand your idea completely.
I'll confirm:
If anything is unclear, I'll ask clarifying questions before proceeding.
Output: Clear problem statement and MVP scope definition.
---
Instructions: I'll research where your target customers hang out and how easy it is to reach them.
Using REDDIT_SEARCH_POSTS, I'll search Reddit for:
Using xai_x_search, I'll search X/Twitter for:
Using tavily_search, I'll investigate:
Scoring Criteria (Audience Reach): | Score | Criteria | |-------|----------| | 9-10 | Multiple active communities (10k+ members), clear influencers, proven PH category | | 7-8 | Some active communities, moderate engagement, some influencers | | 5-6 | Niche communities exist but small, distribution unclear | | 3-4 | Hard to find communities, scattered audience | | 1-2 | No obvious community, would need paid acquisition from day 1 |
Output: Audience reach score (1-10) with specific communities and distribution channels identified.
---
Instructions: I'll assess whether you can charge money on day 1.
Using exa_search and exa_find_similar, I'll research:
Using tavily_search, I'll investigate:
Scoring Criteria (Monetization Speed): | Score | Criteria | |-------|----------| | 9-10 | People actively asking to pay, clear pricing comparables, immediate ROI | | 7-8 | Competitors prove willingness to pay, value prop is clear | | 5-6 | Some paid alternatives exist, value needs explanation | | 3-4 | Mostly free alternatives, unclear if people will pay | | 1-2 | No evidence of willingness to pay, would need heavy convincing |
Output: Monetization speed score (1-10) with pricing recommendation and payment setup.
---
Instructions: Using think for extended reasoning, I'll evaluate if this can be built in 6 hours.
2-Hour Planning Checklist:
2-Hour Building Checklist:
2-Hour Deployment Checklist:
Scoring Criteria (Buildability): | Score | Criteria | |-------|----------| | 9-10 | All checklists pass, could be a weekend project | | 7-8 | Minor complexity, might take a full day | | 5-6 | Some technical challenges, 2-3 day project | | 3-4 | Significant complexity, week+ project | | 1-2 | Major technical hurdles, needs team/funding |
Output: Buildability score (1-10) with specific technical recommendations.
---
Instructions: I'll do a rapid competitive analysis.
Using exa_find_similar and exa_search, I'll find:
Using exa_search_news, I'll check:
Using web_scrape on competitor sites, I'll identify:
Key Question: Is this a "better mousetrap" (hard) or "mousetrap for left-handed people" (easier)?
Output: Competitive summary with differentiation angle.
---
Instructions: I'll synthesize all findings into a final verdict.
Scoring Summary:
Verdict Thresholds: | Score | Verdict | |-------|---------| | 24-30 | STRONG GO - Ship this weekend | | 18-23 | GO - Worth building, minor concerns | | 12-17 | CONDITIONAL GO - Needs adjustments (I'll specify) | | 6-11 | NO-GO - Too risky for 6-hour approach | | 0-5 | HARD NO - Fundamental issues |
Output: Final verdict with:
---
Instructions: If verdict is GO, I'll create your specific action plan.
Hour 0-2: Planning
Hour 2-4: Building
Hour 4-6: Deploying
Output: Detailed 6-hour execution plan with specific tools and templates.
---